Polls

Would you be willing to run for office? Or is talking enough?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...

Patriots

The planter, the farmer, the mechanic, and the laborer... form the great body of the people of the United States, they are the bone and sinew of the country men who love liberty and desire nothing but equal rights and equal laws.~ Andrew Jackson

->

Weasels

Barack = Baroque = bizarre = decorated = elaborate = extravagant = flamboyant = grotesque = convoluted = flowery = rococo = florid = bedecked = overelaborate = overdecorated~ Barack = Baroque

->

American Majority and the Hancock Committee for the states.

tea partiers
Image by giveawayboy via Flickr

I have now been to two events hosted by these guys and they are going to be making things happen. Making things happen by training Tea Partiers and others how to engage in the political system.

American Majority offers candidate and activist training while the Hancock Committee is oriented towards helping groups work together to achieve common goals.

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]
  • Share/Bookmark

The Principles Office

First page of Constitution of the United States
Image via Wikipedia

There are many men of principle in both parties in America, but there is no party of principle.

Alexis de Tocqueville

Do we have a party of principle? What are the principles?

Do we even have men of principle? What are those principles?

Are you a Big Tent Republican? Does big tent preclude principle? Reagan’s big tent philosophy is often cited as reason to avoid getting bogged down in policy debates. Or for failing to excommunicate RINO’s. Did Reagan have no principles?

I have asked here before if there is even one principle to which conservatives can agree one must be bound to be accepted into the fold. I have not yet heard the response that was more than a vague exercise in goals.

Conservatives are for smaller government. What is smaller government? The current federal government is at minimum 400% larger than when Reagan ran and won on a platform of smaller government. Do all Reagan Republicans or Democrats agree it should be smaller than what he inherited from Carter? It is at least 800% larger than when Reagan supported Goldwater’s bid to bring smaller government. Would all conservatives today agree to a 90% reduction in the federal government? If so it would still be larger than the government JFK inherited from Ike. Was the government too small under JFK? A loosely defined goal is not a principle. Even if we could agree on a 90% reduction in federal spending that would still be a goal not a principle. The principle would be found somewhere in the argument concerning why a 90% reduction would be a good thing.

If we were the big ball party why would we tell people our big balls are better than the little balls the left likes? Are basketballs inherently morally superior to ping pong balls? What is the principle? Can we quantify it? Can we rally around it? Do we have big balls? Do we accept little balls into the fold? Many say we should.

In matters of style, swim with the current; in matters of principle, stand like a rock.

Thomas Jefferson

Smaller government is a style that appears, thanks to our dear leader, to be in vogue. It has been there before. Yet, we don’t have smaller government. We have not had smaller government in the preceding 100 years. Vague goals without defined principles are ineffective.

The left uses vague goals very effectively because they have no principles and cannot therefore be held to account when they defy those principles. (They do have one principle; state power, at all times at all costs.)

I have seen too many frequently espouse this as a way to hold a coalition together on the right. The problem is then, when we win, what are we going to do? With a fractious coalition of halfhearted conservatives with no binding principles we will get more of the same. Nothing will get done because nobody will even agree on what should be done. Or worse, as happens to the left, the dear leader will simply move to implement that which was HIS agenda and we will find, once again, that we were but a tool to move yet another progressive/compassionate/big government “conservative” to power at the expense of liberty.

What are the principles of conservatism? Of freedom?

It seems to me;

A strict adherence to the US Constitution is fundamental. They wrote it, they meant it; it has produced the greatest nation in history when obeyed and the greatest debt in history when ignored.

The rule of law; applied as equally to the Political Class as to the poorest OR to the most successful citizen.

Citizen Legislature; term limits particularly in the house. We need a citizen legislature that goes home and lives with the laws they pass and pays the taxes they impose.

Some other good ideas:

A repeal of the Income Tax, it was an evil construct from its birth. Kill it now.

A repeal of the 17th Amendment, empower states by ending the direct election of US Senators.

A Balanced Budget Amendment.

Reasonable, constitutional, immigration reform that denies citizenship to any illegal alien and grants birthright citizenship only to the children of citizens.

End the Federal Reserve. They caused the Great Depression and now the Great Recession. It was not worse before there was a FED. The debt driven society they encourage threatens our national existence. Their answer to the current crisis is, in part, to encourage people to go deeper in debt.

Require regulations promulgated by the executive to be approved by the congress. (No more EPA Cap and Trade threats)

Require super majorities (60% or 65%) to raise taxes but not to lower them.

These last may not be principles but are at least specific goals that would, if implemented, unquestionably protect or enhance freedom.

We need another Contract with America. This time something real. Something that sticks. Something that defunds Washington and empowers Americans.

It is time for a new birth of freedom.

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]
  • Share/Bookmark

Primanti’s in Pittsburgh

Just ate at Primanti Bros in Pittsburgh. Had the nearly well known Steak and Cheese with a slice of pizza. Good sandwich, good pizza.

  • Share/Bookmark

The FED is Progressivism

Just a short flight from Becker’s anti-Ron Rant.

Hamilton proposed and oversaw the creation of the First Bank of the US.

Generally central banks in the US have been favored by proponents of a strong national government. Hamilton was also a borderline monarchist. He wanted a King-like President and he wanted the senate to be a British style House of Lords with lifetime tenure. Chuckie Schumer for life.

Though he wrote of balance of power in the Federalist Papers he consistently landed on the side of federal power once the document was ratified. Combine his opposition to the Bill of Rights with his love of federal power and he is what?

He argued against the Bill of Rights because it would contradict the notion that the powers granted were explicit and thereby limited.

“I go further, and affirm that bills of rights, in the sense and in the extent in which they are contended for, are not only unnecessary in the proposed constitution, but would even be dangerous. They would contain various exceptions to powers which are not granted; and on this very account, would afford a colorable pretext to claim more than were granted. For why declare that things shall not be done which there is no power to do?”

Then after it was ratified he argued for the broadest possible definition of the powers. Broad enough in fact, to render the constitution meaningless. The First bank was one such instance. Though not explicitly authorized he argued it was implied.

“That every power vested in a government is in its nature sovereign, and includes, by force of the term, a right to employ all the means requisite and fairly applicable to the attainment of the ends of such power, and which are not precluded by restrictions and exceptions specified in the Constitution, or not immoral, or not contrary to the essential ends of political society.”

The ends justify the means. And exactly the opposite of his Federalist position.

To his credit Hamilton wanted restrictions including;

  • That the Bank, to avoid any appearance of impropriety, would:

1.      be forbidden to buy government bonds. (The FED Owns at least $500 Billion of these. Plus has loaned money to at least one other central bank so that central bank could buy US Bonds.)

2.      have a mandatory rotation of directors. (Check)

3.      neither issue notes nor incur debts beyond its actual capitalization. (I guess since the FED just prints what it needs it never exceeds it capitalization.)

 This isn’t a purely anti-Hamilton position. He was probably a decent guy and like most moral decent people didn’t foresee the lengths to which immoral people will go to get power and how they would exercise it. A problem modern people share when giving power to Bush without realizing Obama would also get to use those powers. Or for a leftist, giving life and death medical power to Obama (because he can be trusted, right?) without remembering that Dr Evil is as likely to be the next president as anybody else.

Madison and Jefferson, among many of the founder fathers, opposed the creation of the First Bank on constitutional principles.

Later, in power himself, Madison helped create the Second Bank. I have sometimes come across old notes I have written and for the life of me cannot remember what they were supposed to mean at the time. I guess that affliction hit Madison.

When Jackson moved to eliminate the Second Bank, Biddle (The Bank President) went so far as to make sweetheart loans to congressmen and he contracted the money supply to bring about recession and thereby create political pressure against Jackson. That bank was miniscule compared to the FED but deliberately caused a recession for political reasons.

If Countrywide was making sweetheart loans to Dodd, and others, and Countrywide was also a primary dealer with the FED, is that far removed from Biddle’s deals?

I wouldn’t say, because I don’t know, if the FED has played the same games as the Second Bank did. They have far more power to do so if they wanted. They have loaned roughly $2 Trillion over the last year without any congressional approval to whom we don’t have a clue. The only real check on their power is their good intentions. We all know the powerful have good intentions, right? At least they think so.

“Power always thinks it has a great soul and vast views beyond the comprehension of the weak.” John Adams

Again I don’t know what they have done but I know what they could do. The concentration of power is unrivaled by any other institution in the country. Since we have functioned as a nation both with and without a central bank it is an unnecessary concentration of power.

Not only does power corrupt but like a moth to the flame it draws the corrupt and the corruptible. Assuming the FED has never yet done anything untoward or unethical; why provide the flame?

A central bank is a primary tenet of communism. 

#5 Centralization of credit in the banks of the state, by means of a national bank with state capital and an exclusive monopoly.

That by itself is reason enough to question the wisdom of a central bank. Especially given that we have implemented at least 8 of Marx’s big 10.

A look at the time of the formation of the Federal Reserve System shows that it was a progressive construct passed by the same progressives who instituted the Income Tax, the 17th amendment and prohibition. At the time the commie progressives were building the current statist model the FED was one of their primary pillars

The left understood 125 years ago that to implement their statist agenda they would need to destroy the foundation the nation was built on, the US Constitution and the rule of law. They have virtually done just that. With the possible exception of quartering soldiers there is not one Constitutional right or common law principle they have not significantly infringed upon.

If we’re going to defeat the statist progressive machine we are now governed by, and restore constitutional government, we need to destroy the foundation that it is built on.

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]
  • Share/Bookmark

The Next Bubble

President Barack Obama confers with Federal Re...
Image via Wikipedia

Did you ever wonder what a bubble looks like before it is filled?

This is the perfect opportunity to see one. The FED is in talks to sell assets to your mutual fund manager for later repurchase by the FED. If you have money in a mutual fund you are getting ready to buy FED assets in a huge way. Since the number of people and countries willing to buy US debt is falling they have to find some way to continue selling FED securities. In this case in the name of removing an excess of liquidity caused by an excess of ink and paper being FED into a printing press.

Chairman Ben S. Bernanke yesterday charted ways the Fed might withdraw record monetary stimulus pumped into the economy to fight the recession. Among the central bank’s tools are reverse repurchase agreements, in which the Fed sells securities with the intention of repurchasing them at a later date.

The Fed is also considering reverse repurchase agreements with mortgage lenders Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, said the person familiar with the discussions. Freddie Mac spokeswoman Sharon McHale declined to comment. Fannie Mae spokesman Brian Faith also declined to comment.

“To further increase its capacity to drain reserves through reverse repos,” Bernanke said, the Fed is “in the process of expanding the set of counterparties with which it can transact” beyond primary dealers of government securities.

How will it bubble? If the Mutual Funds are allowed to leverage the purchase of even a 3% interest security can become a 15% return. A 15% return will draw your money and mine. After all in the current market who wouldn’t want that? This return won’t be based on reality it will be based on a false choice of government/FED interest. That means a tremendous amount of the still liquid capital is about to pour into a nonproductive investment. e.g. a government sponsored mal-investment.

By sucking capital out of the productive sector of the economy and placing it into government service it will further exacerbate the Great Recession. Tax revenues will shrink due to a lack of capital formation targeted to productive uses. To cover the shortage government will borrow more from the FED, increasingly its lender of last resort, which will sell more assets into this Mutual Fund scheme. It may even cause a spike in interest rates, as funds tank up on securities, providing a greater paper return and a continuing death spiral as less and less capital is available for productive use.

But it has an ending. Like the housing bubble we may not know the trigger but one day, maybe when the Chinese decide to dump the US debt they own, the dollar will collapse. The paper profits will disappear. You will be a zillionaire, now go buy a taco if you can afford it.

The bubble will do what bubbles do. But only after having sucked the vast majority of the middle class wealth out of the pockets of Americans to spend on political patronage stimulus money. It is the middle class, IRA’s, 401K’s, teachers funds, regular investments accounts, that invest in mutual funds.

Of course the joke will be on the Big Businesses, Unions and Wall Street Bankers. A worthless dollar will be no more valuable to them than us.

It may all seem grim but don’t worry the left does have a plan.

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]
  • Share/Bookmark

Are you Free?

Here is a cool tool to find out your state’s ranking.
Freedom Rankings

  • Share/Bookmark

Hayek Keynes Rap

http://econstories.tv/home.html Great Rap on economic theory.

  • Share/Bookmark

I know no way of judging the future but by the past. Patrick Henry

Engineers are continually adding to the body of knowledge and principles that comprise their particular art. Bridges get longer, buildings get higher, cars go faster and yet arrive with a higher degree of safety at their destinations. The medical profession uses techniques and knowledge acquired thousands of years ago. And yesterday. We live longer and healthier lives because of it. Mathematicians need not discover Pythagorean’s Theorem today any more than a carpenter need invent a hammer to build with. They are tools that have been given to us by our forefathers which when used properly allow us to do things the original inventors could never do. Pythagoras could never have built the moon lander. Without Pythagoras, neither could we.

It is on their shoulders we stand.

Anybody who has ever had children can instantly grasp the importance of that statement.

Don’t touch that.

Don’t do that.

Don’t stand there.

Don’t dress like that.

Don’t drink that.

Work hard.

Be honest.

Study hard.

Eat to live, don’t live to eat.

Yes it is important to allow children to make mistakes, but one of the most useful lessons a child will learn is to trust their parents and, by extension, their forefathers. Sometimes, OK lots of times, a parent might say, “you shouldn’t do X,” but then allow them the freedom to do X. We do this in the hope that this contributes to building a trust in the parent by the child. “Hey, when my Dad says something is a good/bad idea he is usually right.” If we can build that trust; they can stand on our shoulders.

A good scientist has to understand the value of integrating the known universe with the as-yet undiscovered areas of science. Most of the great scientists in history understood they were building on the work of their predecessors. Sometimes their work would lead to clarifying earlier mistakes, but that was the exception, not the rule. They often collaborated with contemporaries even if competition was fierce. The goal was generally the same: to establish truth and build up our understanding of that truth. Build on prior work, cast aside failed theories, reach for core truths.

“Every science has for its basis a system of principles as fixed and unalterable as those by which the universe is regulated and governed. Man cannot make principles; he can only discover them.” Thomas Paine

Conservatism is all about standing on the shoulders of our forefathers.

Our revolutionary forefathers believed mightily in standing on their forefathers shoulders. Most of the active framers were extremely well read of both ancient and contemporary philosophies and theories of government. As they drafted various constitutions, state and federal, they applied the knowledge of their forefathers as intelligently as possible.

“Democracy… while it lasts is more bloody than either aristocracy or monarchy. Remember, democracy never lasts long. It soon wastes, exhausts, and murders itself. There is never a democracy that did not commit suicide.” John Adams

 

They recognized democracy as a short path to tyranny. It was rejected. Some, like Hamilton, favored monarchy. He was denied. They were even familiar with early socialists and recognized it for the dark disaster it is. They examined the historical record of various forms of government. Their purpose was nothing less than the preservation of liberty. They rejected the forms that history had shown to be utter failures and tried to build on the only system that seemed viable. “A Republic, if you can keep it.” And they did a good job of it.

“The brave man inattentive to his duty, is worth little more to his country than the coward who deserts in the hour of danger.” Andrew Jackson

 

We slept.

Today we are up against a failed theory. Whatever name we give Marxism- Progressivism, Nazism, fascism, liberalism, socialism or communism – it has failed. The social democracies of Europe are failures. China recognized the failure of socialism and, while it maintains its murderous totalitarian government, it practices capitalism. The Chinese leadership recognized a fundamental truth that the American Left has been unable to grasp; Marxism cannot be made to work. Dozens if not hundreds of experiments have been conducted. Marxism, Progressivism and their cousins have murdered more people in the last 100 years than were killed in all the other wars in history. Hundreds of millions have died. Intelligent men have long since realized this is not how you build a legitimate government. The Left just puts their fingers in their ears, nah, nah, can’t hear you. It is a religion for them, all profits are evil and the right to private property must be destroyed are two of its primary tenets.

“How do you tell a communist? Well, it’s someone who reads Marx and Lenin. And how do you tell an anti-Communist? It’s someone who understands Marx and Lenin.” Ronald Reagan

 

Marxism is a dead end in every sense of the word. A Progressive is a fancy dressed Marxist.

Marxists, Progressives, Socialists and other leftists have been actively working for more than 100 years to destroy our liberty and the Constitution that preserves it.

It took five generations, but they are seeing success for their efforts. It is a testament to the strength of the foundations our forefathers laid that it took so long. Why do they destroy it? Because evil exists in the world; some men choose to serve it and some are useful idiots.

When our colonial forefathers recognized the end was coming to the liberties enjoyed by Englishmen in America, they acted. They acted not to revolutionize the world but to conserve what they already had. First they tried the political route. They stayed generally within the bounds of law and so on. They “begged of the King” to do the right thing. This helped to cement their righteous position when it came to war. They were protecting their God given rights and were within their rights to do so using whatever means necessary. If the time comes again when good men must act to defeat tyranny using force of arms it will be the tyrant that bears the burden of blood, not the patriot.

“The right of a nation to kill a tyrant in case of necessity can no more be doubted than to hang a robber, or kill a flea.” John Adams  

 

Whatever the founders intentions; their actions did revolutionize the world. Never has any nation climbed so far, so fast. Our momentum was so great we did not reach apogee until decades after the left had cut power to the engines during the FDR and LBJ years.  The prosperity reached was so great its castoffs swept the world and raised half the planet from the Dark Ages. Some people were better left in the dark.

Our liberty is now grievously threatened and may be coming to an end. We are currently in the political phase of our battle. The Tea Parties were a nationwide gathering of freemen imploring their leaders to do the right thing. Not much different than the petitions sent by the colonists to King George begging of him to do the right thing. The Progressives now laugh at and deride our entreaties. One can only imagine the jokes and guffaws in George’s Court at the pretension of the colonists. I doubt they were as vulgar as one night of CNN Tea Party coverage.

Ancient Rome declined because it had a Senate, now what’s going to happen to us with both a House and a Senate?” Will Rogers

 

 In a few short months the Republicans will likely retake control of the House and perhaps the Senate. They won’t have the numbers to directly undo the Progressive damage. They may not have the will even had they the numbers.

They must refuse to participate in bankrupting the nation. They must refuse to assist in the ills of ObamaCare. They ought to hinder any Cap and Trade disaster by refusing to put it in the budget. They may just lie and claim they are powerless in the face of the opposition.

“A national debt, if it is not excessive, will be to us a national blessing.” Alexander Hamilton

 

Boy that Hamilton. What a kidder. Thanks Alex. Or maybe we should thank Aaron. The mountains of debt that have been generated by both parties will sink us shortly. As Adams said, “Facts are stubborn things.” (Yes, he said it before Reagan.) The fact is this debt has reached a proportion that already calls into question our national ability to pay even the interest, let alone the principal. If interest rates take off as they did in the early eighties we could be looking at literally trillions per year in interest alone. Bush and Obama had the foresight to finance almost all of our debt short term. Financing a home mortgage on an ARM may be foolish; mortgaging your nation to an ARM is treasonous.

Within 18 to 24 months the fate of the Republic may well be decided. Two more years of trillion dollar borrowing will put repayment beyond reach. I don’t think that means blood and guts and bodies lying in the street, but when historians look back they will point to this time as the point of no return. It may have already passed last year when Dubya destroyed capitalism to save it.

“Mischief springs from the power which the moneyed interest derives from a paper currency which they are able to control, from the multitude of corporations with exclusive privileges… which are employed altogether for their benefit.” Andrew Jackson

 

Will the FED print us out of debt? To what end? More borrowing? More entitlements? More spending to destroy more cars? To buy more oil from those who would destroy us or toys or trinkets from those who murder their own? Do we take a mortgage to pay off our credit card debts so we can keep on swiping? Will we cut up our cards? Are we really going to print our way out of debt?  Just this once?

If we have government shutdowns and extreme leftwing acrimony, we may have a chance. If CNN and MSNBC are screaming at the top of their airwaves every night about the rightwing extremists in Congress, it will be like paddles to a flatliner. But if the Republicans retake either house and pass even one unbalanced budget, if they fund one day of ObamaCare or collect one penny of a Cap and Trade Tax, it will be the equivalent of blockading Boston Harbor; a declaration of war on the American people by a Political Class that surrenders all appearance of legitimacy.

Would we discard Pythagorean’s Theorem on the suggestion of a grade school math teacher? Because it is to hard for second graders to understand? Or for her to teach? Why  are we so eager to throw away the liberty bequeathed by our forefathers at the suggestion of a self-serving political class?

We could achieve no greater honor as Americans, as conservatives, than to stand on the shoulders of our forefathers. To preserve the liberty their blood purchased.

“Is life so dear or peace so sweet as to be purchased at the price of chains and slavery? Forbid it, Almighty God! I know not what course others may take, but as for me, give me liberty, or give me death!Patrick Henry

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]
  • Share/Bookmark

Total War Means TOTAL WAR

“with a firm reliance on the Protection of Divine Providence, we mutually pledge to each other our Lives, our Fortunes and our sacred Honor”
There were some poor, many “middle” class and a few that were filthy rich. John Hancock was likely the richest man in America at the start of the revolution. Samuel Adams was generally broke. Everyone risked all.
Total War is not only defined by what you are willing to destroy in your quest for victory but what you are willing to lose.
“The only hope you have is to accept the fact that you’re already dead. The sooner you accept that, the sooner you’ll be able to function as a soldier is supposed to function: without mercy, without compassion, without remorse. All war depends upon it.” Ron Speirs, Band of Brothers
You may lose your job, you may lose your fortune, and you may lose your friends. You may not get invited to appear on Fox or MSNBC. Your children are being taught in the schools to revile what you believe; you may lose them to the culture. If we continue down the road we are on, civil war will come to America, and you may even lose your life. All liberty depends upon men who are willing to risk everything. It has always been so.
I do not advocate civil war but I do recognize the inevitable result of tyranny. Psychology has laws as immutable as gravity or economics; people will only take so much. Mass psychology is practiced by those in power in the same way the FED practices monetary policy. Statism bubbles are blown up and the pressure/anger is relieved by “conservative” victories when the statists recognize the pent-up anger has reached critical mass. Of course the conservative victories never quite undue the frameworks laid and successes made in the prior advance. As the recent stock and real estate bubbles resulted in economic devastation due to miscalculations of the FED, it is inevitable that the statists will miscalculate the anger generated by their actions. It may be this time. To use FED jargon, their models would predict a brief interlude of control by “conservatives” would be a relief valve on the pent-up anger and thereby safely deflate the bubble. What is going to happen when the Republicans retake the congress this fall and then fail to dismantle Obamacare, Cap and Trade, etc.? Are real Americans going to quietly sit through more shameless duplicity on the part of the Republican Establishment?
The left has been practicing a form of almost bloodless Total War against basic liberty for more than 100 years. They have been willing personally to lose all in order to accomplish their progressive goals. Why would they fight so sacrificially in support of tyranny? I don’t know either but that is why they are called useful idiots. How many Democrats are not seeking re-election in 2010 already? But they voted for ObamaCare anyway. Winning is all that matters. Total War.
We’re whipped. I saw a comedian once refer to it as chicken-whipped in order to maintain a family friendly show.
In fact, we are so badly chicken-whipped that many on the right faithfully and righteously support many of the goals of the progressives for fear of being labeled naïve or uncaring.
As long as that is the case; we will stay whup’d.
Who is for destroying Social Security?
Who wants to scrap the DEA and all federal drug laws?
Who wants to eradicate the FDA? The Federal Reserve?
The EPA and the Dept of Education?
The NRLB and AMTRAK?
No more Medicare or Medicaid at the federal level?
Seat belt laws?
Can we not get out of the UN? Must we fund this dictators club?
These are all things that were pushed through by the progressives at the expense of liberty.
I can’t get on an airplane or open a bank account without going through a virtual strip search (soon to be an actual virtual strip search). But in spite of all of the ridiculous nonsense it was ordinary Americans that stopped the EunuchBomber. It was ordinary people that stopped Richard Reid (and hopefully soon that other treacherous Reid, “Harry”). It would have been ordinary Americans that stopped 9/11 had they not been disarmed by a wayward government.
The IRS and Income Tax are both thoroughly evil and absolutely incompatible with liberty. Yet there are too many on the right who think it is only fair for the wealthy to be taxed this way. The self-made wealthy are punished for success while drunken trust fund babies take the floor to rail against them. We are all forced annually to testify against ourselves in plain contravention of the dreaded 5th.
Too many on the right still believe anyone invoking the 5th is guilty. Refusing to answer the question is prima facie evidence of guilt, right? Only guilty people have something to hide, right? The truth is that only fools believe such tripe.
If we are going to win a Total War all of the things the left have implemented must be destroyed. As soon as you decide that your favorite unconstitutional progressive program should be preserved then Total War is not being practiced, and the left wins another one of its two steps forward one step back battles.
We will see this shortly when the Republicans retake congress in the upcoming elections. Watch as they attempt to FIX ObamaCare instead of eradicating it entirely. We occasionally see some similarly moronic legislation to force the IRS to play “nice”. The Republican Establishment’s focus on making things work well, instead of standing on principle and asking if it should be allowed to exist, is as responsible for the state we are in as anything the left has done.
The answer is not easy but it is simple;
(Thanks EPU and nessa) Carthago Delenda Est, leave no stone standing upon another, plow the streets and salt the earth so that nothing can grow there again.
We must DESTROY every element of progressivism or like the noxious weed it is, it will grow back. We must accept with humility when our current or former positions are helpful to the enemy and destructive of liberty. And then change.

The men who founded this country did risk everything. Whether poor or rich they all knew death, prison or poverty was the price of failure. In fact many suffered all these things in spite of victory.
But not us. Unfortunately Samuel Adams perfectly described the Right of today when he said;
“If you love wealth more than liberty, the tranquility of servitude better than the animating contest of freedom, depart from us in peace. We ask not your counsel, nor your arms. Crouch down and lick the hand that feeds you (Mitch). May your chains rest lightly upon you and may posterity forget that you were our countrymen.”—Samuel Adams
As long as unemployment is low and the dollar is strong nobody gets worked up.
Somebody recently asked a bunch of British veterans of WWI and WWII if, given the state of British society today, it was worth it. Most said no. They wouldn’t do it again.
Is there any doubt we would get the same response from Washington, the Adams’s, Jefferson or Paine were they to see the depths we have plumbed in the name of civility, profitability and providing for the general welfare?
There is nothing wrong with civility or profit until they are gained at the price of principle.
We do not live our principles.
How many would vote not guilty as a juror when the defendant is clearly guilty but you think the law is bad or unconstitutional? How could any juror ever vote to convict a person for violating a law the juror was unaware of before the trial? Ignorance of the law is no excuse we are told. Tens of thousands of pages of law, hundreds of thousands of pages of legally binding case law and bureaucratic regulation and we are responsible for every word? Are we to be bound by these millions of words while they refuse to be bound by the 7600 words of the US Constitution?

How many contribute to Wal-Mart profits even though it supports the healthcare trash being pushed and has people on staff specifically to teach its employees how to access the welfare state?
Who will buy a GM car if the deal is better than what Ford or Toyota offer?
Who takes their kids to Disney World or Disney movies?
What’s in our wallets? How many of us have credit cards drawn on banks that took bailouts?
Where are our PRINCIPLES?
Total War means TOTAL WAR.
Or does it?

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]
  • Share/Bookmark

Silence of the Lambs

The utter failure of the Republicans in the senate, not only to stop healthcare but their failure to even offer a serious fight to prevent its passage leaves regular Americans with some difficult choices. There were a thousand parlimentary tricks that could have been used to slow its passage and of course everyday closer to the 2010 elections the easier it would have been to stop passage altogether, yet they simply capitulated. No real fight was offered and the few Republicans like Coburn and Demint who seemed willing to fight were actually restrained by the Republican leadership.
We must embrace the truth of our situation.

Why has the left been so successful since the inauguration?
They spent a hundred years laying the groundwork. Starting with TR and ending with Mitch.
They’ve spent a hundred years getting leftists elected and appointed. They’ve built case law and regulations and legislative history and executive orders. It has apparently culminated in this last election.
Why is it so hard to believe a movement that would dedicate so much time and energy to reach the goal would miss the obvious and not have control of the “opposition?” McConnell never has to vote or do anything overt on behalf of the left all he has to do is sit this one out. Take a dive. Which on healthcare he dutifully did. McCain, Snowe, Spector have also somehow managed to be in the wrong place at the wrong time on bill after bill.
As Sherlock Holmes would say, “When you have eliminated the impossible, whatever remains, however improbable, must be the truth.”

These people are purposefully posing as Republicans when their true intent is to advance the liberal agenda. It may seem improbable but LOOK at their results!!!

The truth is we ARE a bunch of Rubes. We continually allow these people to undermine or outright betray the country time after time in the clutch moments. Guess what, sleepers are SUPPOSED to look like us as much as possible while doing the enemies work. Yet half of those on the right defend these guys and block every attempt to purge this disease. Oh no, we can’t have standards. Or accountability. We’re a big tent.
As has been observed the third party route is a dead-end but the sentiment behind it is not. If we place our bets on today’s Republican Party, as constituted; we are going to lose. Or we can make the Republican Party BE the third party the country is crying for. If we can do away with the shape shifters and changelings that have undermined and denied every principle and value this nation was built on.
For one hundred years we have lost battle after battle to these people because we have failed to treat this like it is a war for survival. We continually give up ground that once surrendered is never recovered. We are afraid of appearing too zealous or suspicious. We have allowed ourselves to live in fear of being labeled racist or homophobe or rightwing extremist or whatever and then they label us anyway. We buy into a silly notion that somehow in the end we will win no matter how foolish or misguided our actions. We repeat ad nauseam silly platitudes about how elections have consequences yet act as if they don’t.
They treat this like it is a war and because of this attitude they are winning the war.
If our actions don’t change our future is a fine or jail time because we haven’t health insurance;
Starving because we haven’t a carbon credit to buy a Big Mac;
Or a ride on a cattle car because we are a drain on their Great Society.

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]
  • Share/Bookmark

If you show up drunk for work…..

If US Senator Max Baucus shows up drunk for work will he be fired?

Maybe he was channelling Ted Kennedy.

  • Share/Bookmark

Wood making comeback as power source

A short story on America’s reversion to wood fired power plants. It’s real.

What is next? Trash for Clunkers, trading in your car for a horse? Or maybe a Stanley Steamer?

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]
  • Share/Bookmark
Get Adobe Flash playerPlugin by wpburn.com wordpress themes

What's Hot